Economic and Financial Impacts of the Draft Transition Plan for BC Salmon Farms

Executive Summary

Background

Case Studies

Alternative Option

News Release

Download the Report

Executive Summary

The “Economic and Financial Impacts of the Draft Transition Plan for BC Salmon Farms” is an analysis of the economic and financial impacts of a ban on marine net-pen salmon farming as proposed in the Government of Canada’s Draft Salmon Aquaculture Transition Plan for British Columbia, September 2024.

Going directly to a ban by 2029 will result in significant long-term negative socio-economic impacts in British Columbia and Canada. It will reverse and harm once positive Indigenous economic development and reconciliation efforts and severely impact employment in areas with a history of underemployment. An unjustified ban and push to unproven technology on salmon farming in B.C. will reduce Canadian agri-food production by 400 million healthy meals per year, eliminate B.C.’s top agri-food export, destroy 4,560 jobs, and cost Canadian taxpayers at least $9 billion.

The anticipated impacts of the ban are as follows:

1.  Loss of $1.17 billion in annual economic activity, $435 million in GDP, and 4,560 fewer well-paid full-time jobs with a combined annual payroll of approximately $259 million.

2.  Loss of $437 million in spending with over 1,400 vendors across B.C.

3.  Elimination of a further 50,000 tonnes of farmed salmon production.

4.  Reverse meaningful Indigenous reconciliation, self-determination and rights and title for impacted First Nations.

5.  Devastation to several rural, B.C. coastal communities—the removal of this critical industry for Vancouver Island, with an average salary that is 30 percent higher than the median employment income, takes away meaningful career opportunities and the ability for rural, coastal, and Indigenous communities to attract and retain their youth.

6.  Impose unnecessary costs on Canadian taxpayers of at least $9 billion to compensate for the industry’s closure and to subsidize unproven closed containment tech companies.

7.  It ignores the existing responsible plans of B.C. salmon farmers and First Nations to minimize further interactions between farmed and wild salmon – which would deliver the same policy outcome as the ban without the devastating consequences for coastal and Indigenous communities.

8.  Contradicts the government’s own policies, resulting in the complete loss of investor confidence in Canada to invest in new innovations and technologies.

Figure 1. BC Salmon Farming Impacts, Canada-wide
*Growth scenarios are based on company projections of potential recovery of production under the responsible transition plan.

Background

Salmon farming in B.C. began over 40 years ago and has become deeply embedded in coastal Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities and local economies. By 2019, the sector employed some 7,500 people directly and indirectly, engaging with over 2,400 suppliers, contributing $1.9 billion to the economy annually, and produced about 90,000 tonnes of salmon.

Today, 100 percent of BC’s farmed salmon is raised in agreement with Rights Holder First Nations. The sector directly and indirectly employs over 1,000 Indigenous people and provides about $134 million in total annual economic benefits to First Nations peoples.

The B.C. salmon farming sector has already weathered closures of production sites in the Broughton Archipelago, Sunshine Coast region and the Liǧʷiłdaxʷ (Laich-will-tach) territory known as the Discovery Islands that has reduced annual production capacity from over 90,000 tonnes to less than 50,000 tonnes, a 45% reduction over a 6-year period. This has led to annual losses of over $770 million in economic output, $286 million in GDP, 3,000 jobs and $170 million in income for families.

On June 19, 2024, the Government of Canada announced a decision on the future of marine net-pen salmon farming in B.C. The decision committed to implementing a ban on current marine net-pen salmon aquaculture in B.C. coastal waters by June 30, 2029. It required that any new salmon aquaculture licences be either land-based closed containment or marine-based closed containment.

B.C. salmon farming companies, their suppliers, and the First Nations in whose territories they operate have stated that the proposed ban on current fish-growing operations and technology requires implementing new technologies which do not exist on a practical or commercial scale. Mandating unproven technologies to be adopted by 2029 will end investment by B.C. salmon farming companies in R&D, as well as in operations and production. Companies across B.C.’s integrated salmon farming value chain will close, and thousands of jobs will be lost. Communities on Vancouver Island will suffer most, including Campbell River, Courtenay, Port Hardy, Sayward, Port McNeill, Port Alberni, Tofino/Ucluelet, but also mainland coastal communities like Klemtu and others.

Case Studies

Browns Bay Packing

Read Case Study

Browns Bay Packing Company, located north of Campbell River, continues the family legacy of the Millerd family that has been processing BC salmon since 1913. Browns Bay Packing was established in 1989 and, in its continual spirit of innovation, became a major farmed salmon processor while continuing to handle limited amounts of wild salmon. 

Maintaining processing infrastructure has also allowed the company to assist more than 11 First Nations with their Food, Social and Ceremonial, as well as commercial fisheries.

When the Discovery Island decision was made in 2019, Browns Bay Packing was forced to cancel its next evolution: a state-of-the-art seafood processing facility in Campbell River in partnership with local First Nations. This facility would use year-round farmed salmon production to stabilize operations and support multiple seasonal commercial indigenous fisheries that did not have dedicated processing capacity.

In 2024, as BC salmon farm production dropped off, Browns Bay was forced to lay off more than 70 long-term full-time employees, many of them from local First Nations communities. These employees are paid at a scale that reflects the “living wage” for the urban city of Vancouver, a high wage for Vancouver Island. Being forced to seasonal processing may provide just enough hours for a reduced staff to qualify for unemployment insurance.

During this year’s commercial wild salmon season, Browns Bay was shut down for the first time in decades and unable to assist local First Nations with their food fisheries. In 2025, Browns Bay will make the difficult decision of whether to cease its 35 years of operations in the Campbell River region and a 130-year legacy in the BC Seafood sector.

Cermaq Canada Protocol with the Ahousaht First Nation

Read Case Study

The business relationship with Cermaq Canada has had a long-term positive social and economic impact on the Ahousaht Nation, located in Clayoquot Sound on the west coast of Vancouver Island, and on its citizens and community. A form of protocol agreement has been in place in Ahousaht Territory since 2006. It has been reviewed, modernized, and updated several times since, with the most recent agreement updated in 2021/2022.

Respect and recognition of Ahousaht governance, Territory, and position as a Rightsholder is central to the Protocol. The agreement addresses operational plans, environmental stewardship, wild salmon protection and enhancement, economic development opportunities, employment, and emerging business opportunities.

The latest protocol further focuses on wild salmon, area-based management, food fish procurement, innovation, and broader environmental monitoring in recognition of changing ocean conditions, climate change, strict environmental standards, and compliance criteria. Cermaq is committed to aligning the required resources for culturally appropriate recruitment, advancement, skill development, and retention of Ahousaht employees (including neighbouring nations).

The protocol also specifies economic development, social well-being and benefits sharing. Economic benefits that would be lost with the ban include:

  • Opportunities for equity investment;
  • The creation of a health and wellness facility;
  • Food security, including the provision of salmon and commercial fishing capacity;
  • Climate/wellness action in the form of electrification of a new alcohol/drug-free village site;
  • Local supply chain business acquisition by the Nation and;
  • Diversification into aquaculture of alternate species.

Over the thirty-year generational cycle, the economic benefits of this protocol are estimated at $543 million to the Ahousaht Nation, all dependent on the finfish operations remaining in the territory.

Chilean and Norwegian Exports of Farmed Salmon to Canada

Read Case Study

Fresh salmon continues to be the top seafood choice of Canadians. During 2024 reductions in BC farmed salmon have resulted in imports of worth approximately $20 Million CDN per month into Canada at the expense of local jobs and climate goals.

In November 2024, Silvana Gattini, trade commissioner for state export promotions agency ProChile speaking in Chile noted: “… the reduction in the supply of Canadian salmon represents an opportunity for the Chilean product, which could occupy part of that space in the market by reinforcing its sustainability and traceability credentials, elements of high value for Canadian consumers.”

According to Chile’s National Customs Service, between January and September 2024, 6,838 tonnes of salmonids raised in open net pens worth US$84 million ($117M CDN) were exported from southern Chile to Canada, an increase of 34% in volume and 31% in value compared to the same period in 2023, when 5,075 tonnes were exported for US$64m ($89M CDN).

Statistics from the Norwegian Seafood Council show that compared to the same period last year, the amount of farmed salmon exported by Norway to Canada jumped by 35%, or around Can $11.2 million, to Can $42.8m in the first half of 2024.

The Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance estimates that the climate impacts of air freight imports of salmon from northern Europe and the southern regions of South America equals the carbon footprint of adding about 84,000 cars to Canadian roads.

Alternative Option

B.C. salmon farming companies, suppliers, and First Nations within whose territory’s salmon farming operates have communicated to the federal government that transition cannot be a “ban” on marine net-pen salmon aquaculture in five years. If it is, then there is no future for salmon farming in B.C. 

A ban on marine net pens means that most of the innovative technologies being developed and tested by salmon farming companies and other tech suppliers cannot be deployed in B.C. But these innovations can deliver the same outcome as a “ban”, by further reducing potential interactions between farm-raised salmon and wild salmon over time. 

This begs the question: if the same outcome can be achieved using achievable innovative technologies, what is the justification for banning marine net-pen aquaculture in B.C. coastal waters by June 30, 2029? 

Major investments in innovation are being made by salmon farmers worldwide, but not in B.C. due to the dramatic production cuts caused by the federal government and the resulting economic impacts that have put the future of salmon farming companies in B.C. at risk. Salmon farmers are developing and testing world-leading innovations and deploying those innovations once they have been proven to be sound from a risk, cost, and sustainability perspective. 

It will take much longer than the five-year time frame set out in the government’s June 2024 transition decision to adopt the right combination of technologies suitable to specific site conditions and characteristics in B.C. In the absence of near-term stability measures by the government, including movement away from the term “ban” and DFO-initiated regulatory decisions that could result in further loss of production volume, the ability to invest and innovate in B.C. salmon farming will disappear. 

However, if the federal transition plan is what is stated on page 1 of the Government of Canada’s Draft Salmon Aquaculture Transition Plan for British Columbia: “transition to closed containment and other innovative aquaculture technology adoption,” then the industry and First Nations believe there is a chance for a realistic and achievable path forward “toward a future sustainable, innovative and thriving aquaculture sector for B.C.” 

To achieve this, B.C. salmon farmers, in partnership with First Nations in whose territories the sector operates, have presented detailed plans to further eliminate potentially harmful interactions between farm-raised and wild salmon in B.C. 

B.C. salmon farmers and First Nations have presented responsible plans to the Government of Canada that demonstrate potential economic gains and achieve the same outcome as a ban. If supported, by 2030, the salmon farming sector expects to generate over $2.5 billion in output, $930 million in GDP, and 9,800 jobs, paying $560 million in wages annually. By 2040, the annual economic benefits could reach $4.2 billion in output, $1.55 billion in GDP, over 16,260 jobs and $920 million in wages for Canadian workers.